Courtroom Arguments
Structured advocacy frameworks built on binding Supreme Court precedent. Ready to adapt for your matter.
Writ Petition
Article 32 / 226 frameworks
Bail Application
Anticipatory & regular bail
SLP
Special Leave Petition arguments
Revision
Revision petition templates
Criminal Appeal
Section 374 / 378 appeals
Constitutional
Fundamental rights challenges
Courtroom Arguments is a Premium feature
Subscribe to access all argument frameworks with full citation support and downloadable PDFs.
Challenging President's Rule Under Article 356 — A Complete Advocacy Framework Post S.R. Bommai
A complete step-by-step framework for challenging proclamations of President's Rule under Article 356. Covers floor test arguments, attacking the Governor's report, establishing mala fide, and the secularism ground — built entirely on S.R. Bommai v. Union of India.
Key Precedents
- S.R. Bommai v. Union of India, (1994) 3 SCC 1
- Rameshwar Prasad v. Union of India, (2006) 2 SCC 1
- Nabam Rebia v. Deputy Speaker, (2016) 8 SCC 1
The Triple Attack Doctrine — Deploying Articles 14, 19 and 21 Together in Constitutional Litigation
Most advocates argue one Article. Winning advocates deploy all three simultaneously. This framework shows how to structure a composite constitutional challenge under Articles 14, 19 and 21 — the Golden Triangle doctrine born from Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India.
Key Precedents
- Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India, (1978) 1 SCC 248
- Francis Coralie Mullin v. Administrator, (1981) 1 SCC 608
- Olga Tellis v. Bombay Municipal Corporation, (1985) 3 SCC 545